Mn2Ga2S5 and Mn2Al2Se5 van der Waals Chalcogenides: A Source of Atomically Thin Nanomaterials

Layered chalcogenides containing 3d transition metals are promising for the development of two-dimensional nanomaterials with interesting magnetic properties. Both mechanical and solution-based exfoliation of atomically thin layers is possible due to the low-energy van der Waals bonds. In this paper, we present the synthesis and crystal structures of the Mn2Ga2S5 and Mn2Al2Se5 layered chalcogenides. For Mn2Ga2S5, we report magnetic properties, as well as the exfoliation of nanofilms and nanoscrolls. The synthesis of both polycrystalline phases and single crystals is described, and their chemical stability in air is studied. Crystal structures are probed via powder X-ray diffraction and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. The new compound Mn2Al2Se5 is isomorphous with Mn2Ga2S5 crystallizing in the Mg2Al2Se5 structure type. The crystal structure is built by the ABCBCA sequence of hexagonal close-packing layers of chalcogen atoms, where Mn2+ and Al3+/Ga3+ species preferentially occupy octahedral and tetrahedral voids, respectively. Mn2Ga2S5 exhibits an antiferromagnetic-like transition at 13 K accompanied by the ferromagnetic hysteresis of magnetization. Significant frustration of the magnetic system may yield spin-glass behavior at low temperatures. The exfoliation of Mn2Ga2S5 layers was performed in a non-polar solvent. Nanolayers and nanoscrolls were observed using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Fragments of micron-sized crystallites with a thickness of 70–100 nanometers were deposited on a glass surface, as evidenced by atomic force microscopy.


Introduction
Layered compounds of transition metals demonstrate interesting functional properties.In such compounds, it is possible to change the chemical composition by various substitutions [1], including solid solutions [2], intercalations [3], or the formation of intergrowth structures [4].All these possibilities can be used to significantly modify the electronic band structure, yielding the semiconducting [5], magnetic [3], and magnetoresistive properties [6].Furthermore, the formation of ferromagnetic, antiferromagnetic, and helicoidal magnetic structures, the appearance of magnetoelectric and multiferroic properties, and the creation of frustrated low-dimensional systems is possible [7,8].In the case of halide, chalcogenide, and pnictide systems, bulk materials can be exfoliated via a wet technique in liquids [9] or the simple separation of layers using an adhesive tape [10].These techniques are easy to implement compared to molecular beam epitaxy or organometallic chemical vapor deposition.Theoretical studies indicate the possibility of creating spin field-effect transistors based on the chalcogenide materials [5].Furthermore, two-dimensional materials may demonstrate the switching of the type of magnetic ordering with respect to the bulk material.For example, in the case of an A-type antiferromagnet, the exfoliated atomically thin materials have surprisingly show ferromagnetic properties [7].Moreover, during the formation of heterostructures, more complex magnetic behavior can be obtained due to the edge states.For example, the switch between the symmetric and antisymmetric magnetoresistance effect was observed in the MnPS 3 /Fe 3 GeTe 2 heterostructure [11].Also, the heterostructures may show interesting properties in the vicinity of room temperature, including strong plasmon-exciton coupling [12].These properties open a wide field for the creation of new micro-and nanodevices.
Mn-based layered chalcogenides are cutting-edge materials with peculiar magnetic and electronic properties in the two-dimensional limit.For example, MnPS 3 is a source of nanomaterials with a thickness of several atomic layers and outstanding functional properties [13][14][15][16][17].For this compound, the dielectric breakdown strength of E = 5.41 × 10 6 V/cm at the tunneling barrier height of φ = 1.31V (for 9 or more layers) was observed, which can be used in field-effect transistors or magnetic tunnel junctions [18].In the case of MnBi 2 Te 4 [19][20][21][22][23], an odd-even layer-number effect was observed for atomically thin materials, which can be applied in heterostructures too [24].Recently, the MnAl 2 Se 4 and MnAl 2 S 4 layered chalcogenides attracted interest as a source of nanomaterials [25].These compounds are candidates for frustrated magnetism and spin-glass behavior [26].Their crystal structures are homologous to those of the Mg 2 Al 2 Se 5 structure type [27], which fosters the search for related compounds.
In this paper, we present the Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 and Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 isomorphous layered chalcogenides as a promising source of two-dimensional materials.Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 is a new compound, and we report its synthesis and crystal structure for the first time.Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 was first detected during exploratory syntheses in the MnS-Ga 2 S 3 system [28].Recently, the crystal structure, magnetic properties, and heat capacity of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 have been reported [29,30], indicating the significant spin-glass character of the magnetic system.Here, we report synthesis, crystal growth, magnetic properties, and exfoliation of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 .Together with Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 , these layered chalcogenides postulate the new "225" family of Mn-based materials with interesting magnetic properties.

Synthesis and Air Stability
The Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 compound was synthesized by annealing the elements at 1173 K in evacuated quartz ampule.For the Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 compound, binary selenides should be pre-synthesized since the elemental precursors strongly react with a quartz ampule at high temperatures.The synthesis of MnSe and Al 2 Se 3 proceeds at the lower temperature of 973 K.After that, they were weighed according to the stoichiometric composition, carefully ground, and pressed into a pellet.Synthesis of Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 was performed at 1123 K to reduce possible degradation of quartz ampule.All operations with samples were carried out in a glove box filled with argon because the intermediate and target compounds are capable of oxidizing/hydrolyzing in air.
The Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 single crystals were synthesized via chemical vapor transport reactions.For this purpose, various transport agents, such as S, I 2 , and HgI 2 , were tested.The highest quality crystals of the target phase were observed when using 15 mg HgI 2 per 500 mg of the sample.The resulting mixture was sealed into an evacuated long quartz ampule and annealed in a furnace with a temperature gradient of ∆T = 100 K.The resulting micalike crystals were submillimeter in size.The composition of the crystals, according to energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS), is Mn 2 Ga 2.0(2) S 5.5(4) and thus consistent with the nominal one.EDXS mapping shows the homogeneous distribution of Mn, Ga, and S (Figure 1).
The synthesis of nanomaterials was carried out on a glass substrate.The polycrystalline sample of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 was placed in a heptane and was subjected to ultrasonic irradiation for 20 min at a temperature of 40 • C. The resulting colloidal solution was settled for 10 min and poured into a new container.Deposition onto the substrate was carried out at room temperature in small portions of 0.02 mL.The interval between depositions was 1 min.The synthesis of nanomaterials was carried out on a glass substrate.The polycrystalline sample of Mn2Ga2S5 was placed in a heptane and was subjected to ultrasonic irradiation for 20 min at a temperature of 40 °C.The resulting colloidal solution was settled for 10 min and poured into a new container.Deposition onto the substrate was carried out at room temperature in small portions of 0.02 mL.The interval between depositions was 1 min.
The chemical stability of Mn2Ga2S5 and Mn2Al2Se5 in air was checked using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD).To do this, the samples were fixed on an open holder.PXRD patterns were registered immediately and after storing the samples in air.The signal accumulation time was identical in both PXRD experiments.Figure 2 shows that Mn2Ga2S5 is stable in air for a long time (1 week was tested).However, for the Mn2Al2Se5 sample, the broadening of reflections and the drop in intensity were already observed after 15 min in air.In addition, as soon as the Mn2Al2Se5 sample appears in the air, a characteristic odor of hydrogen selenide is detected.Notably, the sample contains a small admixture of Al2Se3 ~ 5 mass % (Figure 3), which is a strong Lewis acid.The hydrolysis reaction is presumably connected with the presence of Al2Se3, which is used as a starting material.Attempts to synthesize Mn2Al2Se5 without the admixture of Al2Se3 were not successful due to the formation of the MnAl2Se4 homologous compound [25].The chemical stability of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 and Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 in air was checked using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD).To do this, the samples were fixed on an open holder.PXRD patterns were registered immediately and after storing the samples in air.The signal accumulation time was identical in both PXRD experiments.Figure 2 shows that Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 is stable in air for a long time (1 week was tested).However, for the Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 sample, the broadening of reflections and the drop in intensity were already observed after 15 min in air.In addition, as soon as the Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 sample appears in the air, a characteristic odor of hydrogen selenide is detected.Notably, the sample contains a small admixture of Al 2 Se 3 ~5 mass % (Figure 3), which is a strong Lewis acid.The hydrolysis reaction is presumably connected with the presence of Al 2 Se 3 , which is used as a starting material.Attempts to synthesize Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 without the admixture of Al 2 Se 3 were not successful due to the formation of the MnAl 2 Se 4 homologous compound [25].

Crystal Structure
The Mn2Ga2S5 compound was obtained as a single-phase sample, and a small admixture of Al2Se3 was found in Mn2Al2Se5 according to PXRD (Figure 3).The crystal structure was refined by the Rietveld method using the Mg2Al2Se5 structure as a starting model [27].CCDC 2344029 and 2344030 deposition numbers can be used to request the structural

Crystal Structure
The Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 compound was obtained as a single-phase sample, and a small admixture of Al 2 Se 3 was found in Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 according to PXRD (Figure 3).The crystal structure was refined by the Rietveld method using the Mg 2 Al 2 Se 5 structure as a starting model [27].CCDC 2344029 and 2344030 deposition numbers can be used to request the structural data.The measurement and refinement details, parameters of atomic positions, and selected interatomic distances are given in Tables 1-3, respectively.The Mg 2 Al 2 Se 5 prototype compound crystallizes in the P3m1 space group with unit cell parameters of a = 3.88 Å, c = 16.00Å.The crystal structure can be described as the densest hexagonal packing of Se atoms, where the Se layers alternate in the order of (ABCBCA) (Figure 4).Octahedral voids are filled with magnesium cations between the layers A-B and C-A, while aluminum cations are located in tetrahedral voids between the layers B-C and B-C.The van der Waals gap is formed between the C-B layers in the middle of unit cell (in this interlayer space, the voids are not occupied by cations).In the initial structure, the mixed occupation of cationic positions is not described [27].atoms, where the Se layers alternate in the order of (ABCBCA) (Figure 4).Octahedral voids are filled with magnesium cations between the layers A-B and C-A, while aluminum cations are located in tetrahedral voids between the layers B-C and B-C.The van der Waals gap is formed between the C-B layers in the middle of unit cell (in this interlayer space, the voids are not occupied by cations).In the initial structure, the mixed occupation of cationic positions is not described [27].The crystal structure of Mn2Ga2S5 was studied previously [30], but the mixed occupation of cationic positions was not considered.In this work, we have established the mixed occupancy of crystallographic positions by Mn and Ga atoms.The Mn2Al2Se5 compound has been prepared and investigated for the first time.The positions of atoms and selected interatomic distances of the refined crystal structures are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.Mn2Ga2S5 and Mn2Al2Se5 are isomorphous, crystallizing in the Mg2Al2Se5 structure type (Figure 5).Both compounds demonstrate a mixed population of cationic positions.For Mn2Ga2S5, the occupation of Mn 2+ cations in the octahedral position is 79.5%, while the tetrahedral position contains 79.5% of Ga 3+ cations.In the crystal structure of Mn2Al2Se5, Mn 2+ and Al 3+ jointly populate the octahedral position, with the ratio of 64.5%/35.5%,respectively.The assumed charge of Mn 2+ with the 3d 5 electron shell configuration in the high-spin state has the same preference and no energy difference between the octahedral and tetrahedral environment from the point of view of the crystal field theory, which may be a reason for the mixed occupation of octahedral and tetrahedral sites in the crystal structures.The crystal structure of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 was studied previously [30], but the mixed occupation of cationic positions was not considered.In this work, we have established the mixed occupancy of crystallographic positions by Mn and Ga atoms.The Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 compound has been prepared and investigated for the first time.The positions of atoms and selected interatomic distances of the refined crystal structures are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 and Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 are isomorphous, crystallizing in the Mg 2 Al 2 Se 5 structure type (Figure 5).Both compounds demonstrate a mixed population of cationic positions.For Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 , the occupation of Mn 2+ cations in the octahedral position is 79.5%, while the tetrahedral position contains 79.5% of Ga 3+ cations.In the crystal structure of Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 , Mn 2+ and Al 3+ jointly populate the octahedral position, with the ratio of 64.5%/35.5%,respectively.The assumed charge of Mn 2+ with the 3d 5 electron shell configuration in the high-spin state has the same preference and no energy difference between the octahedral and tetrahedral environment from the point of view of the crystal field theory, which may be a reason for the mixed occupation of octahedral and tetrahedral sites in the crystal structures.

Magnetic Properties
The magnetic properties of Mn2Ga2S5 were investigated for polycrystalline and single-crystal samples via DC magnetization measurements (Figure 6).The temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility demonstrates an antiferromagnetic-like transition at

Magnetic Properties
The magnetic properties of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 were investigated for polycrystalline and singlecrystal samples via DC magnetization measurements (Figure 6).The temperature dependence of magnetic susceptibility demonstrates an antiferromagnetic-like transition at T N = 12.7 K and high-temperature Curie-Weiss-type behavior in agreement with the previous reports [29,30].Magnetization curves above T N indicate the absence of magnetic admixtures, while the slight ferromagnetic-like hysteresis below T N is presumably due to the strong frustration of magnetic moments.Furthermore, the hysteresis of magnetization at 2 K demonstrates change of the slope in the vicinity of the 3.6 T magnetic field, which may be due to the canting of magnetic moments with respect to the easy-axis direction.Approximation of the high-temperature data via the modified Curie-Weiss law yields the Weiss temperature of θ = −350 K and an effective magnetic moment of µ = 4.97 µ B .The Weiss temperature indicates a sufficiently strong exchange interaction between the magnetic centers.Furthermore, the observed large value of T N /|θ| = 28 points at a high degree of magnetic frustration in the system, which may be caused by the triangular arrangement of Mn 2+ species between the hexagonal S layers and by the mixed occupation of octahedral and tetrahedral sites, as observed in the PXRD experiments.The effective magnetic moment is slightly lower than expected for Mn 2+ = 5.92 µ B [31].Magnetic susceptibility of the oriented single crystal demonstrates slight anisotropy below the transition temperature, which is absent in the high-temperature paramagnetic state.

Morphology and Nanomaterials
A polycrystalline sample of Mn2Ga2S5 was used to prepare nanomaterials via exfoliation in a non-polar solvent.Two types of crystallites are observed using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM): nanoscrolls, which are formed as a result of bending of atomically thin flakes (Figure 7a), and microflakes with a thickness of 10-100 nm (Figure 7b).EDXS mapping confirms the uniform distribution of Mn, Ga, and S species in the studied crystallites.The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern collected from the nanoscrolls (Figure 7c) shows the splitting of the 100 reflections as a result of the material bending during the formation of nanoscrolls.Figure 7e shows the [001] zone found in the central part of a flake.A HRTEM image with atomic resolution clearly indi-

Morphology and Nanomaterials
A polycrystalline sample of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 was used to prepare nanomaterials via exfoliation in a non-polar solvent.Two types of crystallites are observed using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM): nanoscrolls, which are formed as a result of bending of atomically thin flakes (Figure 7a), and microflakes with a thickness of 10-100 nm (Figure 7b).EDXS mapping confirms the uniform distribution of Mn, Ga, and S species in the studied crystallites.The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern collected from the nanoscrolls (Figure 7c) shows the splitting of the 100 reflections as a result of the material bending during the formation of nanoscrolls.Figure 7e shows the [001] zone found in the central part of a flake.A HRTEM image with atomic resolution clearly indicates the d 100 spacing of the electron density.Furthermore, the SAED pattern collected from the [001] zone can be indexed using the unit cell parameters of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 obtained from the PXRD experiment.The SAED-and PXRD-based values of d-spacing are in perfect agreement, confirming the close-packing motif of the crystal structure (Table 4).4.   4. The study of substrates with deposited particles of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 was performed using atomic force microscopy (AFM).To confirm the presence of particles on the surface, we calculated the roughness of an empty glass substrate surface (Figure 8a) and the surface area of 2 × 2 µm 2 (Figure 8b, blue frame) after deposition, where no particles are present.The root mean squared roughness value for the 2 × 2 µm 2 fragment of the area on raw glass was 6-8 nm, and it was 8.2 nm for the empty area of the sample, with a total roughness of the entire sample area of 30.5 nm.These data show the appearance of new objects on the surface.At the micron scale, it was possible to observe particles, less than 100 nm thick, with a flat surface.These particles possess a highly-oriented flat surface, which is visible in the yellow-dark contrast in Figure 8b.The oscillations are shown more clearly in the line profiles of the AFM signal (Figure 8c).The observed type of distortion persists while changing the scanning speed within 0.2-1 rows per second and applying different forces of pressure of the cantilever onto the surface.These oscillations are probably associated with weak adhesion of the particles to the glass surface; so, particles can be easily deformed by the cantilever and respond to it as a non-rigid surface.Thus, the line profiles indicate a variation in the visible thickness of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 particles that does not exceed 70 nm.
Molecules 2024, 29, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 13 The study of substrates with deposited particles of Mn2Ga2S5 was performed using atomic force microscopy (AFM).To confirm the presence of particles on the surface, we calculated the roughness of an empty glass substrate surface (Figure 8a) and the surface area of 2 × 2 µm 2 (Figure 8b, blue frame) after deposition, where no particles are present.The root mean squared roughness value for the 2 × 2 µm 2 fragment of the area on raw glass was 6-8 nm, and it was 8.2 nm for the empty area of the sample, with a total roughness of the entire sample area of 30.5 nm.These data show the appearance of new objects on the surface.At the micron scale, it was possible to observe particles, less than 100 nm thick, with a flat surface.These particles possess a highly-oriented flat surface, which is visible in the yellow-dark contrast in Figure 8b.The oscillations are shown more clearly in the line profiles of the AFM signal (Figure 8c).The observed type of distortion persists while changing the scanning speed within 0.2-1 rows per second and applying different forces of pressure of the cantilever onto the surface.These oscillations are probably associated with weak adhesion of the particles to the glass surface; so, particles can be easily deformed by the cantilever and respond to it as a non-rigid surface.Thus, the line profiles indicate a variation in the visible thickness of Mn2Ga2S5 particles that does not exceed 70 nm.

Materials and Methods
For the synthesis of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 , Mn (plates, 99%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), Ga (lump, 99.99%, Sigma-Aldrich, United States), and S (powder, 99.98%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used as precursors.The binary precursors MnSe and Al 2 Se 3 were synthesized from Mn (described earlier), Al (granules, 99.999% Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA), and Se (granules, 99.999%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA).All operations with samples were performed in an argon-filled glove box (Spectro-systems, p(H 2 O, O 2 ) < 1 ppm).All precursors were weighed in the stoichiometric ratio with accuracy of 10 −4 g.Before annealing, all substances were placed in a quartz ampule, evacuated to a residual gas pressure of 5 × 10 −3 mbar, and flame-sealed.The Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 sample was annealed twice at 1173 K for 5 days with intermediate grinding.MnSe and Al 2 Se 3 binary selenides were obtained by annealing the elements at 973 K for 5 days.After checking their purity by PXRD, MnSe and Al 2 Se 3 were mixed in the stoichiometric ratio and pressed into a pellet with a diameter of 6 mm at a pressure of 1200 kgf/cm 2 .Synthesis of Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 was performed by annealing the pellet at 1123 K for 5 days.For the growth of single crystals, Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 powder (total mass of 0.5 g) was placed in a quartz ampule and, after adding 15 mg of HgI 2 , evacuated and flame-sealed.The ampule was placed in a tube furnace with a temperature of the hot zone T 1 = 1273 K and the cold zone T 2 = 1173 K and annealed for 10 days.The resulting crystals were observed in the cold zone.
A phase composition study and crystal structure refinements were performed via PXRD using data obtained on a Huber G670 Guinier camera (Cu Kα 1 radiation, Ge 111 monochromator, image plate detector).The samples were enclosed between two mylar films and fixed in the sample holder in an argon-filled glove box.Crystal structure was refined using the Jana2006 software package.CCDC 2344029 and 2344030 deposition numbers can be used to request the structural data.Chemical stability was studied using a Bruker D8 Advance powder diffractometer (Cu X-ray source, no monochromator, LYNXEYE detector).The experiment was performed in the Bragg-Brentano geometry; thus, the preferred orientation of crystallites along the [001] direction is present on the registered patterns (Figure 2).The measurement and refinement details, parameters of atomic positions, and selected interatomic distances are given in Tables 1-3, respectively.According to the Rietveld analysis, the structural R-factors of R obs = 7.8% for Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 and 4.4% for Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 indicate the validities of structural models of 92.2% and 95.6%, respectively.
Images of single crystals and mapping and analysis of elemental compositions were obtained using scanning electron microscopes JSM JEOL6490-LV and Carl Zeiss Leo SUPRA 50 VP with energy-dispersive X-ray detectors INCA at accelerating voltage of 20 kV.The polycrystalline sample of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 was studied using HRTEM on a JEOL JEM-2100 UHR at accelerating voltage of 200 kV.Before analysis, suspension of the sample in heptane was dropped to a copper grid and treated with plasma.SAED patterns were calibrated using a standard gold sample.Images from the HRTEM were processed using the ImageJ package [32].
Glass substrates were used to deposit nanomaterials.The films were examined via AFM, which was performed using NTEGRA Aura (NT-MDT, Moscow, Russia) in a semicontact mode.
The magnetization of single-crystal and polycrystalline samples was measured using a Magnetic Properties Measurement System (MPMS-XL5 SQUID, Quantum Design, San Diego, CA, USA).The measurements were performed in zero-field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) conditions.Temperature dependencies were measured from 2 K to 300 K in magnetic fields of 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 5 T, and field dependences were measured at temperatures 2, 6, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, and 300 K when scanning the magnetic field from −5 to 5 T.

Conclusions
In this work, we report on the synthesis, structure, and properties of two chalcogenides, Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 and Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 , belonging to the family of layered van der Waals compounds.For the latter compound, which is hygroscopic, only synthesis and crystal structure determination are reported, whereas for the former chalcogenide, the entire investigation, including magnetic properties evaluation and fabrication of nanomaterials via exfoliation, was performed.Both chalcogenides exhibit a mixed population of cationic positions, have a van der Waals gap in their crystal structures, and display typical features of layered compounds; in particular, texturing and preferential orientation of crystallites perpendicular to the crystallographic c-axis were observed via powder X-ray diffraction and selected area electron diffraction.Magnetic measurements reveal a sufficiently strong exchange interaction between the magnetic centers and a high degree of magnetic frustration in Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 , which may be caused by the triangular arrangement of Mn 2+ cations and the mixed population of octahedral and tetrahedral sites by manganese and gallium.Using liquid exfoliation in a non-polar solvent under ultrasonic treatment, it was possible to obtain Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 nanoflakes and nanoscrolls.Further studies of the electronic and magnetic properties of these low-dimensional materials are highly desirable.They can be utilized in the design of heterostructures with further application in spintronics.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.(a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the Mn2Ga2S5 single crystal; (b) EDXS mapping of the surface.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.(a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 single crystal; (b) EDXS mapping of the surface.

Molecules 2024 , 13 Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Chemical stability of Mn2Ga2S5 in air.PXRD patterns of Mn2Ga2S5 before and after reaction with air are shown as purple and orange lines, respectively.The positions of the peaks are shown by black ticks.The peaks of the SiO2 admixture are marked by asterisks.The difference curve is shown in green (Imax = 52,891 counts).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Chemical stability of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 in air.PXRD patterns of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 before and after reaction with air are shown as purple and orange lines, respectively.The positions of the peaks are shown by black ticks.The peaks of the SiO 2 admixture are marked by asterisks.The difference curve is shown in green (I max = 52,891 counts).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Chemical stability of Mn2Ga2S5 in air.PXRD patterns of Mn2Ga2S5 before and after reaction with air are shown as purple and orange lines, respectively.The positions of the peaks are shown by black ticks.The peaks of the SiO2 admixture are marked by asterisks.The difference curve is shown in green (Imax = 52,891 counts).

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. PXRD patterns of Mn2Ga2S5 (a) (Imax = 40,011 counts) and Mn2Al2Se5 (b) (Imax = 19,168 counts).The experimental data are shown by the purple dots, and the theoretical pattern is presented by the orange line.Black ticks show the positions of reflections.The difference curve is shown as a green line.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. PXRD patterns of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 (a) (I max = 40,011 counts) and Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 (b) (I max = 19,168 counts).The experimental data are shown by the purple dots, and the theoretical pattern is presented by the orange line.Black ticks show the positions of reflections.The difference curve is shown as a green line.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Densest hexagonal packing of Se atoms in the Mg2Al2Se5 structure: (a) View along the c direction; (b) view along the b direction.Black spheres indicate the A-plane of Se atoms, and blue and red indicate the B-and C-planes, respectively.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Densest hexagonal packing of Se atoms in the Mg 2 Al 2 Se 5 structure: (a) View along the c direction; (b) view along the b direction.Black spheres indicate the A-plane of Se atoms, and blue and red indicate the B-and C-planes, respectively.

13 Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Magnetic properties of Mn2Ga2S5: (a) magnetic susceptibility of the polycrystalline sample in various magnetic fields; (b) Curie-Weiss fit of the high-temperature inverse susceptibility of polycrystalline Mn2Ga2S5; (c) magnetization curves measured on the oriented single crystal for H||c; (d) magnetic susceptibility of the oriented single crystal for H||ab and H||c.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Magnetic properties of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 : (a) magnetic susceptibility of the polycrystalline sample in various magnetic fields; (b) Curie-Weiss fit of the high-temperature inverse susceptibility of polycrystalline Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 ; (c) magnetization curves measured on the oriented single crystal for H||c; (d) magnetic susceptibility of the oriented single crystal for H||ab and H||c.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. EDXS mapping and HRTEM of Mn2Ga2S5 nanomaterials: (a) typical bright-field TEM image of nanoscroll; (b) bright-field TEM image of a flat crystallite; (c) SAED pattern collected from the area, which is shown by the red circle in (a); (d) EDXS mapping; (e) HRTEM image of the [001] zone; the inset shows intensity profile measured along the white line; (f) SAED pattern taken along the [001] direction from the area shown by the black rectangle in (e).The white circles indicate the series of reflections with d-spacings presented in Table4.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. EDXS mapping and HRTEM of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 nanomaterials: (a) typical bright-field TEM image of nanoscroll; (b) bright-field TEM image of a flat crystallite; (c) SAED pattern collected from the area, which is shown by the red circle in (a); (d) EDXS mapping; (e) HRTEM image of the [001] zone; the inset shows intensity profile measured along the white line; (f) SAED pattern taken along the [001] direction from the area shown by the black rectangle in (e).The white circles indicate the series of reflections with d-spacings presented in Table4.

Table 1 .
Crystallographic data and experimental details for Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 and Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5.

Table 2 .
Atomic parameters for the crystal structures of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 (a) and Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 (b).

Table 3 .
Interatomic distances for cations in the crystal structures of Mn 2 Ga 2 S 5 (a) and Mn 2 Al 2 Se 5 (b).

Table 1 .
Crystallographic data and experimental details for Mn2Ga2S5 and Mn2Al2Se5.

Table 4 .
Comparison of d-spacing values from PXRD and SAED.

Table 4 .
Comparison of d-spacing values from PXRD and SAED.